Syncrethism in the Philosophy of the Pan-Unity of Vladimir Solovyov and Plotinus

Authors

  • Svetlana G. Gutova Nizhnevartovsk State University. 56, Lenina Street, Nizhnevartovsk, 628605, Russian Federation

Keywords:

mysticism, rationalism, Neo-Platonism, methodological syncretism, philosophy of panunity, Godmanhood, holistic knowledge, “the One”, emanation

Abstract

This article gives the comparative analysis of philosophical ideas of Plotinus and V.S. Solovyov.
The center of interest is the basic principles in their construction of the “pan-unity” theory. It is
asserted that the idea of pan-unity is presented in the entire history of philosophical knowledge –
from its sources up to now. The brief survey of the philosophical development of this idea shows its
close connection with the philosophical mysticism, since the syncretic form of the construction of
conceptual systems dominates in this field. It is found, that the problem of the construction of complex
syncretism systems consists of the need for the methodological synthesis of the rational and mystical
(or intuitive) ways of knowledge. To disclose the specific character of cross-cultural synthesis the
methods of historic-philosophical reconstruction and comparative analysis were used. The main
concepts of Plotinus and Solovyov philosophy were analyzed in this key. The logical connection in
the theoretical constructs of Solovyov and Neo-Platonism in the region of epistemology, ontology
and anthropology is revealed. It is accented that there is succession between the ideas of Goodness
and Unity from Plotinus to Solovyov. In addition, the conclusion that Solovyov’s philosophical
views rise from established mystical tradition is done. However, they were directed toward its
development, comprehension and completion in the spirit of age.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

Issue

Section

WORLD PHILOSOPHY: ITS PAST AND PRESENT

How to Cite

Gutova, S. G. . (2019). Syncrethism in the Philosophy of the Pan-Unity of Vladimir Solovyov and Plotinus. History of Philosophy, 23(1), 67-81. https://hp.iphras.ru/article/view/3081