Philosophical and Religious Ideas of American Transcendentalism in the Teachings of Swami Vivekananda

Authors

  • L. E. Zhukova Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. 15 Naberezhnaya reki Fonfanki, Saint Petersburg, 191011, Rus­sian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-2-47-59

Keywords:

Indian philosophy, Indian Renaissance, American transcendentalism, Swami Vive­kananda, Ramakrishna, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, neovedanta, ways of God realization, yoga

Abstract

The article contains a comparative analysis of philosophical and religious views of the Indian thinker and public figure Swami Vivekananda and the philosophers of the American transcenden­talism movement. The author focuses on understanding by the intellectuals of various aspects of the Divine. As representatives of American transcendentalism, the most prominent figures of this movement are considered, in whose works the main transcendentalism ideas are expressed – philosophers Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau and William Ellery Channing. Hermeneutical and historical-philosophical methods are used in the study. As a result, the obvious similarity of many positions in the teachings of thinkers is recognized, caused by common sources of their views. At the same time, significant differences in the views of Western philosophers and Indian thinker are revealed. They are represented in the ideas about the divinity of man, about na­ture as a metaphysical force, as well as in the question of the search for and knowledge of God. The conclusion about Vivekananda’s adequate comprehension of the works of American trans­cendentalists and his using of transcendentalism ideas for forming a masterful interpretation of the foundations of Indian culture for Western society is done.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-13

Issue

Section

WORLD PHILOSOPHY: ITS PAST AND PRESENT

How to Cite

Zhukova, L. E. (2023). Philosophical and Religious Ideas of American Transcendentalism in the Teachings of Swami Vivekananda. History of Philosophy, 28(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-2-47-59