Philosophy of Historical Alternatives: “Uchronie” by Charles Renouvier

Authors

  • A. A. Krotov Lomonosov Moscow State University. Lomonosovsky prospect, 27/4, Moscow, 119234, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-2-36-46

Keywords:

Charles Renouvier, neocriticism, Uchronie, French philosophy, philosophy of history

Abstract

The article analyzes the philosophy of the history of French neo-Kantianism school founder, the creator of the idea of Uchronia, Charles Renouvier. Attention is focused on the theoretical atti­tudes inherent in various stages of the creative development of Renouvier, and on their connection with «utopia in history». In his philosophy of history, Renouvier opposed the concept of predesti­nation, the need for all events taking place. He insisted on the presence of freedom in history, on the possibility of moving along other paths of social reality, not fixed by tradition. In the alter­native version of history depicted by the French thinker, Christianity triumphed not in the West, but in the East. The Crusades took place but were geographically directed in the opposite course. Progress in understanding of religion later returned Christianity to the West in a form cleared of fa­naticism. Renouvier connected the future of human civilization with the republican social struc­ture. He predicted the end of all kinds of wars. In a cautious, veiled form he criticized the Second Empire regime in France. Renouvier’s concept contained both strengths and weaknesses. It is fruit­ful in its call to focus in political life on the idea of the effectiveness of human free will, the idea of maximizing the moral content of the concept of the state. It is vulnerable in its intention to at­tach decisive importance to the intellectual factor in history.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-13

Issue

Section

WORLD PHILOSOPHY: ITS PAST AND PRESENT

How to Cite

Krotov, A. A. (2023). Philosophy of Historical Alternatives: “Uchronie” by Charles Renouvier. History of Philosophy, 28(2), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-2-36-46