Gerhard Oberhammer. Introduction to “Pakṣilasvāmin’s Introduction to his Nyāyabhāṣyam”

Preface, translation and commentaries

Authors

  • L. I. Titlin Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-2-117-139

Keywords:

Gerhard Oberhammer, Viennese indological school, indology, Nyāya, Pakṣilasvāmin, Vātsyāyana, Nyāyasūtram, Nyāyabhāṣyam, Vāda, soteriology

Abstract

The publication is a commented translation and study of the work “Pakṣilasvāmin’s Introduc­tion to his Nyāyabhāṣyam” by a prominent Austrian indologist and intercultural philosopher G.R.F. Oberhammer. The author examines the background of Oberhammer’s research, gives a brief information about the school of Nyāya and focuses on how Oberhammer demonstrates the history of Nyāya and its becoming aware of itself as a philosophical system based on the short text of Pakṣilasvāmin (Vātsyāyana) introduction to his Nyāyabhāṣyam. In his article, Oberhammer answers the question why such heterogeneous parts as elements of the theory of argumentation borrowed from the ancient tradition of Vāda (the theory of debate), logic and epistemology, cos­mology and the doctrine of the soul and its liberation from the bonds of saṁsāra (soteriology) were combined into the harmonious philosophical system of Nyāya and how this happened during the development of the school due to its becoming aware of itself as a method of searching for truth (and what this truth is from the point of view of Nyāya), how this was helped by creative bor­rowing from another philosophical school – Yoga. The publication is prefaced by a brief history of the Viennese oriental and indological school, to which Oberhammer belongs.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-13

Issue

Section

PUBLICATIONS AND TRANSLATIONS

How to Cite

Gerhard Oberhammer. Introduction to “Pakṣilasvāmin’s Introduction to his Nyāyabhāṣyam”: Preface, translation and commentaries (L. I. Titlin , Trans.). (2023). History of Philosophy, 28(2), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-2-117-139